Cloud InfrastructureX

Sampling plans and evidence review for financial audit fieldwork

From our Taichung office we write defensible sample sizes, stratification layers, and evidence-file notes that engagement managers can put straight into working papers.

Flagship offering

A sampling memorandum your partner can actually review

We take a named account population — receivables, inventory, or expenses — and produce the method, size rationale, selection worksheet, and exception steps that belong in the file before substantive testing begins.

Auditor reviewing printed schedules and notes at a desk

Audit Sampling Program Design

Fixed-fee engagements starting at NT$48,000, typically delivered in typically 5–12 business days after population data is received.

Review scope & inclusions

Related work

Evidence sessions, strata, and file gaps

Professional reviewing printed financial documents at a meeting table

Evidence Review Sessions

Structured review of vouchers, confirmations, and supporting packs against the assertions you are testing.

From recent engagements

What teams notice after the memo lands

Their sampling memo for our receivables population finally gave our Taipei partner something concrete to challenge — including a note that MUS was a poor fit for our credit-heavy ledger. We still had to chase two confirmation exceptions ourselves.

Mei-Ling Chen · Audit manager, mid-size manufacturing client

We booked two evidence review half-days before inventory count. They flagged missing gate logs on three high-value shipments; the warehouse had the paper, we just had not asked for it.

Hiroshi Tanaka · Controller, electronics exporter

Read more client stories

How work starts

Scoping before sample size

We begin with the assertion, the population boundary, and materiality already set by your engagement team. Only then do we recommend MUS, classical sampling, or a stratified hybrid. See the full path on our engagements page.

Follow an engagement timeline